|
Chris's Metal Detecting Page - njminerals.org is mainly about [what else?] mineral collecting,
but Treasure Hunting is sort of related, so here goes... this section may become larger as time
allows. Behold, Chris's Metal
Detecting Page. The following is a general
response to a few forum posts on the Internet where people seemed
confused. I'm a chemist but not a professional conservator, so
I claim no responsibility if you use some method to ruin a coin, even if
I said it would work. I also claim no responsibility if you
destroy property or hurt yourself or someone else. Nobody is
forcing you to work with chemicals. If you want to live in a
world free from all sources of harm, go live in a bubble.
(Even then you'll slowly degrade due to your body's own biochemical
processes.) A little Chemistry
lecture The surface of a metal object can be damaged in only two
ways: "Chemically" is where a lot of people, sometimes even
conservators who should know better, seem not to understand a few
simple concepts. The metal in a coin or other object has zero charge. It
is
neutral (it is actually metal-bonded, meaning there's a community of
electrons, but we needn't get into that. As far as we need be
concerned, it's neutral). Along comes a chemical compound that
reacts with the
metal. How does it react? Normally, the metal has to go
from zero charge to having a positive charge. To dissolve metal
(other than throwing it into a melt!) the metal has to
become ionized. To do this, a metal atom has to lose one or more
electrons. So we first look at compounds that are capable of reacting with metal: Acids (examples: muriatic acid,
vinegar, lemon juice, tomato juice, nitric acid, etc.) Acids
and bases are also ion-forming
substances, obviously. The point is that neutral salts (e.g.,
NaCl) are neither acid nor base, yet they can corrode metals
dramatically. Chloride ion (such as from common salt) happens to be one of the best-known
corrosion promoters.
Some
compounds fit into sub-categories of the above. For example:
chlorine gas. If you leave copper around chlorine gas, the copper
will slowly corrode. There is moisture in the air, so some
molecules of chlorine will dissolve in some microscopic droplets of
water vapor and go to work on the
surface of the metal. When that happens, you will have ions that
can chemically attack the metal. The same thing goes for
sulfur compounds. These can react with the coin because, when
they are left in contact for long enough, there will form sulfide ions
(S2-) and copper ions (Cu+ and / or Cu2+),
giving
you copper sulfide... a kind of tarnish that is tough to remove
without ruining the piece. If the tarnish is thin, electrolysis
might be OK. If it's thick, then get used to living with
tarnish. The mechanisms of corrosion can be very complex;
sometimes, even corrosion specialists know with certainty only that A +
B + C = corrosion; they know the beginning ions (e.g.,
chloride), but they don't necessarily know all the in-between steps
such as short-lived intermediates. Perhaps nobody does.
Science is of course always working to uncover these mechanisms, which
is how we sometimes get new, corrosion-resistant metals, special
corrosion inhibitors for paints, and so forth. You can dig
through the chemistry and corrosion-science literature and probably
find mechanisms for how (e.g.) salt water corrodes a certain
copper-zinc alloy; however, our rule-of-thumb still holds
true: corrosion of metals has to involve ionization at some point. Anyway, conservators like to guard their trade secrets, but remember
this: either they are touching the metal mechanically or
chemically, or else they're just soaking it to remove loose dirt.
There is no magical, airy, hands-off way to remove tarnish and refrain 100% from degrading the
metal surface in some (albeit microscopic) way. If you're
removing one kind of surface (tarnish, corrosion) but trying
to leave another (the coin's original details), there are only ways to minimize the degradation.
Yes, there are ways to conserve certain coins so you won't notice the
degradation without a powerful microscope, but the success depends
largely on the amount and type of tarnish or corrosion that's on the
coin (as
well as what kind of metal it is). There is no magic
involved. Let's go back to the chemistry lecture. Not all ions are
equally reactive toward a given metal... but
for our discussion let's just say that it's not a good idea to leave a
coin in a solution containing a high ion concentration. That
includes salt water. Consider what the ocean does to pennies. Electrolysis of a coin, where the coin is placed at the
cathode, is still a semi-destructive "conservation" method, at least
for badly pitted coins. The reasons are that (1) the layers of
corrosion that flake off will leave open the pits they had previously
filled, sometimes even pulling away very tiny amounts of metal with
them, (2) there could be some plating-out of metal ions
from the solution, meaning you're chemically attaching something onto
the coin's surface that wasn't there in the first place, and (3) the
loss of patina from deeper areas can make the coin look uniformly
shiny, a definite giveaway that it's been cleaned. As I might
have said before, you don't have much to lose if your coin is just a
badly-corroded disc with no legible details. Then again, you may
run into relic collectors (not coin collectors, usually) who like those corroded discs. Let's say you start with a copper coin and perform
electrolysis on it. First, its
tarnish will flake off into the liquid; a very small amount of
that may go into solution in the electrolyte, depending on what the
electrolyte is; these
newly-released copper ions can plate back out
onto the coin. If you aren't able to control the conditions of
that
electrolysis cell perfectly, it will turn out not to be one of your
magical, airy "no touching" conservation tricks. It will be an
ugly mess. At best, if no plating happens, you still run
the risk of
making the coin look spongy and overbright. It will
not have the naturally-aged look. (Electrolysis followed by
artificial retoning can give decent results for ancient
bronze and copper coins. Experts know how to clean these coins in
a way that they're acceptable to collectors-- electrolysis is not
necessarily one of these methods. However, virtually every
ancient coin on the market has been cleaned.) I also want to mention Hydrogen Peroxide
briefly. I haven't yet studied this in-depth with regard to
cleaning coins, but I can tell you that most of the bubbling you see
when you use peroxide on a coin is from catalytic decomposition of the
hydrogen peroxide itself. You are seeing oxygen bubbles.
This decomposition is caused by the metal and the metal tarnish
compounds. It can also be caused by organic debris such as soil
that may still cling in traces to the coin. Hydrogen peroxide, if
it does react with the metal to dissolve it or form new compounds, does
so only slowly at room temperature and at the customary 3 to 6%
concentration. It may, however, accelerate the action of other
impurities that could attack the metal. I like to use 35% H2O2
for cleaning certain things, but this must be treated with the utmost
respect. It can cause severe skin burns and must be kept away
from certain compounds. It can also cause permanent
blindness. I may post some photos of 35% H2O2
treatment of dug coins (nothing valuable though), as time
permits. It will be necessary to use a container about 10 times
too big, because the peroxide will bubble up vigorously when it touches
the metal. Acetone - This is an organic solvent
that, for all practical purposes, doesn't ionize. I could show
you organic reaction mechanisms involving carbocation formation,
the haloform reaction, etc-- don't worry about these, though. As
far as you
need to know, acetone is a non-ionizing solvent when it's pure.
During extended
soaking, impurities might react with your artifact. However,
fresh-out-of-the-bottle, pure acetone isn't going to hurt your coins if you
soak them for a few hours or even overnight. Just don't leave a
coin in acetone for weeks or months unless you happen to know it is
ultra-pure and has no dissolved water in it.
The higher ratios of water to alcohol seem to corrode metals
much faster. Alcohols typically have too high a pKa to ionize spontaneously (as acids), though there are some
special exceptions (e.g.,
phenol). Water is therefore the real
culprit when people speak of "alcohol corrosion"; it is water,
brought in by the hygroscopic alcohol, that corrodes fuel lines and so
forth. If you really want to see something neat (don't try this on a
good coin!), put a couple of tarnished Lincoln cents into a
mixture of rubbing alcohol, Murphy's Oil Soap, and water. Within
a couple days the tarnish will be gone, and the liquid will have copper
ions in it (visibly pale blue). Somewhere in a notebook I
have the proportions of the mixture I tried, but it probably doesn't matter much. It really
seems to attack copper tarnish compounds much more rapidly than does water
alone, or even water and alcohol alone. Perhaps free fatty acids in the oil soap are responsible. Multi-component solutions can act by complex mechanisms that are not fully understood.
Naphtha - This is an organic solvent
that is even less likely to react, because it doesn't contain as much
oxygen... and it doesn't mix readily with water, so it won't carry a
bunch of dissolved, ionizable impurities. Ideally you want
a degreasing agent that's made of just
carbon and hydrogen, evaporates easily, and isn't toxic (therefore,
benzene is out). If you
could get your hands on petroleum ether or heptane, those would be
excellent degreasing solvents for extended soaking / degreasing of
coins. Hexane, on the other hand, is toxic to humans because of
what it becomes in the liver. Like acetone,
any of these volatile
solvents would be extremely flammable. Methylene chloride, though
it contains more than just carbon and hydrogen, is
another excellent degreaser that should not react at all with a coin's
surface, except perhaps during extremely long soaks such as months or
years. (Here, it would be the chlorine that would be the expected source
of trouble.) Olive Oil - This is a fat (actually, a
combination of several fats). The problem with fats is that there
can be some free fatty acids present. These are not nearly as
reactive toward metal as, say, vinegar. Generally speaking, the
longer the molecule, the less acidic is the fatty acid. If you
leave a copper object in the olive oil for months or years, you may
notice some chemical attack has happened. Some people complain of
darkening-- I wouldn't doubt if there were sulfur compounds present in
olive oil. Olive oil is, after all, not a pure substance. Sulfur-containing compounds are present in many foods. Mineral Oil
- This makes more sense than
vegetable oils from
a chemical standpoint, because Mineral Oil does not have fatty acids in
it (or sulfur). That means pure mineral oil cannot attack metal, no matter
how long you leave it in there. That also means a follow-up soak
with degreaser (such as acetone) can remove ALL traces of the
oil. I've heard a conservator say that putting oil on a coin is
"adding something" extra to the surface. The question here is
really whether that addition is permanent or not. An organic
degreaser such as acetone,
methylene chloride, or naphtha will take the oil away completely,
provided you soak the metal long enough to get the oil molecules out of
any
pores that may be in the surface. This would
especially apply to dug coins. Pure Water - that's right: distilled,
degassed, deionized water. Practically speaking, there are no
ions in pure water. As soon as atmospheric carbon dioxide
dissolves in the water, it's not pure anymore-- it's now very weakly
acidic. It is not easy to maintain pure water because of
this. In fact, when coins go in water, it's almost
guaranteed to bring ions into solution because of the remnants of dirt
and slightly-soluble metal tarnish compounds that cling to the coin's
surface. The more ions that go into solution, the more of a
chemical attacker the water becomes. It's a sort of positive
feedback cycle. I like WD40, and until someone is able to show me there's an ionizable impurity in the stuff, I will continue to use it (cautiously). That is, soaking is OK, but not for very prolonged periods. Perhaps a couple days, followed by a degreasing, followed by mineral oil. I could soak a coin in WD-40 for a couple days, then degrease it thoroughly, and I'm sure you wouldn't be able to tell I had done anything at all to it. If there had been no dirt to lift off the coin's surface, that would have meant I essentially hadn't done anything to it. What you should not do is leave WD40 on the coin. Over time it will gum up and become harder to remove. For this reason I consider WD-40 to be a drying oil, somewhat like linseed but not as pronounced. I haven't researched the components of WD-40 to see if they are true drying oils, but its behavior is close enough for me. You may be wondering: if oils and inert solvents don't
actually do anything
to the metal, why use them? The reason
is that they tend to lift dirt and [loose] corrosion from the
coin.
Dirt particles stuck to a coin have a reasonably high affinity for each
other and for the coin's surface, otherwise they'd just fall off by
themselves. The penetrating action of oil makes the dirt
particles have less of this affinity. In a manner of speaking,
the oil creeps in between the particles and isolates them from each
other. Because dirt is
not a homogeneous (chemically uniform) substance, some of its
components will be better soluble in water, while others will be more
soluble in oil. Either one can potentially do the trick, though,
because one
type of particle may provide the foundation for another particle to
stick to the coin or to another particle. Take away one type of
particle, and the other may have nothing to hold onto... you'll see a
lot of dirt dropping away. Over time, the oil can gradually lift
away flakes of what you thought was a hard surface of brown corrosion,
revealing a green layer that's thinner and might show more detail. | ![]() Site Map / Articles Index |
||||
|